Goldeneye

Decision Journal

Hypothesis log with AI assumption review
Illustrative scenario

Sample analyst · real engine · real prices. A fictional sample analyst’s decisions, scored by the same calibration engine against real market prices — not a real analyst track record. Notice her highest-conviction calls resolved far below what she claimed (~87% claimed → ~29% realized): overconfidence that stays invisible until the engine scores it. This is what calibration looks like in Goldeneye — point it at your desk and it scores your analysts the same way.

New Entry

Resolvable Claim

Optional — extract a direction, horizon, and threshold so this decision can be scored against the market later.

Evidence

No evidence rows.